|
[Contents][Appendix 1]
[Reference 68][Reference
70]
E for Ecstasy by Nicholas Saunders
Appendix 1: Reference Section
- 69 The MDMA Neurotoxicity Controversy: Implications for Clinical
Research, by Dr. Charles Grob
- Grob says that investigations to establish neurotoxicity often contain
flaws in methodology as well as in interpretation. Damage presumed to be
caused by MDMA is surprisingly limited and is confounded by associated variables.
Authorised use of MDMA in Switzerland is "without reports of adverse
neuropsychiatric sequelae".
- Cases of compulsive self-administration are very rare. MDMA is unique
among recreational drugs in that there appears to be a disinclination to
take it repeatedly. "We believe that a thorough yet dispassionate review
of the existing data suggests that experimental use of MDMA in humans can
be justified, " Grob says. But this should only take place in controlled
therapeutic conditions.
-
[Contents][Appendix
1]
[Reference 68][Reference
70] E is for Ecstasy by Nicholas Saunders (contact@ecstasy.org)
HTMLized by Lamont Granquist (lamontg@u.washington.edu)
Ecstasy.org index
Spiritual use
of psychoactives book by Nicholas Saunders
|